Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Also, it may review an appeal of a decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot attain a decision.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decrease courts.
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or girl don't approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf in the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their Careers with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions tend to be the opinions that are filed about the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, for instance Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this style of regulation strives to form our society, supplying rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of very last resort will resolve such differences and, For lots of reasons, these appeals in many cases are not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It's also a properly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not famous criminal law cases act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.